Just days after the Obama administration announced plans to provide full concurrent receipt of disability and military retired pay to eligible veterans by Jan. 1, 2015, a key House committee chairman threw of bucket of cold water on the initiative.Rep. Ike Skelton, D-Mo., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and a supporter of allowing disabled retirees to concurrently receive full military and veterans benefits, said the Obama initiative included in the 2011 defense budget request does not satisfy the House’s strict budgeting rules.Skelton said the problem is that the administration has not identified specific offsets — either cuts in existing programs or revenue increases — to pay for the new benefits for disabled retirees.“This committee has a deep commitment to this issue and our veterans, but we simply cannot enact it unless the administration identifies and advocates for specific offsets,” Skelton said Wednesday at a committee hearing on the 2011 defense request.The budget request sent to Congress on Monday adds $408 million to the military retirement trust fund in 2011 specifically to cover the first phase of a five-year plan to expand concurrent receipt. The money would go to pay full retired pay to people medically retired from the military with fewer than 20 years of service who have disability ratings of 90 percent or greater. The Obama plan calls for full concurrent receipt to be phased in by Jan. 1, 2015, for all disabled retirees who are eligible for both military retired pay and veterans disability compensation.But Skelton said the $408 million increase in the trust fund doesn’t meet congressional “pay-as-you-go” rules, which require a specific offset to pay for a specific increase. Without an offset, Skelton said the committee is unable to pass concurrent receipt legislation.This is not a new problem. The same thing happened last year when the Obama administration proposed a similar expansion of concurrent receipt without including any funding. Skelton said his committee ended up “holding the bag” for an unfunded initiative.Rep. Jim Marshall, D-Ga., a longtime sponsor of concurrent receipt legislation who also sits on the armed services committee, said he is not ready to give up. Marshall said he hopes the armed services committee would “work closely” with the House Ways and Means Committee, which is responsible for tax policy, to find money for concurrent receipt.“It seems to me we ought to be able to find $5.1 billion over a 10-year period of time, as large as our mandatory spending is. We ought to be able to do that and get this done once and for all,” Marshall said.
Read this article: Concurrent receipt may not be properly funded
Representative Skelton has his heart in the right place. However he ignores the over 450,000 retired disabled veterans under 50% disabled that will still be paying for their own disability.
Representative Marhsall is a true champion of the issue of concurent receipt. He has introduced HR 333 on a regular basis. However his comment is off the mark at the end of the article, as the 5.1 billion he is speaking about would only help the 103,000 chapter 61 retirees the president chooses to support for the issue of concurrent receipt. This action would totally ignore the 450,000 retired disabled veterans under 50% disabled, who still have their disability deducted from their retirement pay, who were promised by President Obama to be supported on the issue of concurrent receipt instead of the Chapter 61 retiree, and who are totally ignored by this Administration and the U.S. Congress.
This is all designed to give the appearance of support by Obama and Skelton, while ignoring the true essence of this issue. Representative Marshall obviously does not realize, that the presidents proposal totally ignores the largest faction of veterans who do not receive concurrent receipt, i.e. the under 50% retired disabled veteran, and he obviously does not realize that this administration proposal on covers a tiny percentage of those who do not receive concurrent receipt.
As a chapter 61 vet, I would like to see concurrent reciept for all disabled vets,that being said, why can congress give automakers 3 billion for three months( last year’s cash for clunkers program) and not be able to give 5.1 billion for 10 years or whatever the cost would be? “The country which forgets it’s defenders will itself be forgotten”
I have had difficulties opening this post from my iphone browser, whats the reason?
I was browsing the site above and saw a really fantastic website named FreedomDisability.com that can really help you if you are disabled. This domain address has wonderful information that can assist people with disabilities who live in the United States apply for Disability Insurance and win. This website offers a lot of great tips and information where you can get free information on how to successfully apply for and win SSDI with the Social Security Administration (SSA).